Thesis icon

Thesis

Yogic metaethics: comparing Patañjali’s Yoga, Nondual Śaivism, and Vedānta

Alternative title:
Yogic metaethics
Abstract:

This thesis develops what I believe is the first systematic comparative metaethical analysis of three Indian traditions that contributed significantly to the evolution of modern transnational yoga: Patañjali’s Yoga, Nondual Śaivism, and Vedānta. Chapter 1 begins with an overview of some of the ethical challenges impacting contemporary yoga communities. Chapter 2 introduces metaethics, along with five key philosophical ingredients: causation, the idea of the ‘self’, agency, free will, and moral responsibility. Metaethics may be thought of as the philosophical framework which shapes normative ethical theories and practical ethical deliberation. It is concerned with moral ontology, moral epistemology, moral semantics, and moral psychology. Metaethical theories, karma, and the relationship between metaethics and human rights are also discussed. In Chapters 3-5, three research questions are investigated for each tradition: 1. How might the tradition’s metaethical framework best be characterised? 2. How does the tradition’s view of the phenomenal world and its view of truth affect the scope of its metaethics, and its adherents’ worldview? 3. To what extent does that metaethical framework provide philosophical support for universal human rights? In Chapter 6, I summarise the conclusions.

The overall argument may be stated briefly: 1. While modern transnational yoga has brought benefits to millions, it also faces numerous ethical and epistemological challenges. 2. Some yogic traditions mesh well with modern human rights perspectives, and have an approach to the phenomenal world which more naturally coheres with modern physical- and social-science concerns. For other traditions, the bridges between their philosophies and such concerns are weaker. 3. Contemporary yoga teacher training bodies, teachers, and students, would benefit from greater awareness of the diversity of metaethical perspectives in traditional teachings, and the extent to which they may either support or undermine ethical codes of conduct, human rights principles, and evidence-based teaching and policy.

Actions


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology and Religion
Role:
Author

Contributors

Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
0000-0001-5856-6910
Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
0000-0002-2722-8289
Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
0000-0002-9333-7141


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/05vsmsp39
Funding agency for:
Parris, BW
Grant:
No specific grant number
Programme:
General funds from the Trust
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Parris, BW
Grant:
No specific grant number
Programme:
DPhil support
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Parris, BW
Grant:
No specific grant number
Programme:
Squire & Marriott Bursary
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Parris, BW
Grant:
No specific grant number
Programme:
Hanuman Bursary and Prof. Makhan Lal Roy Chowdhury Book prize


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford


Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP