Journal article icon

Journal article

The complexity of approximately counting retractions

Abstract:
Let G be a graph that contains an induced subgraph H. A retraction from G to H is a homomorphism from G to H that is the identity function on H. Retractions are very well studied: Given H, the complexity of deciding whether there is a retraction from an input graph G to H is completely classified, in the sense that it is known for which H this problem is tractable (assuming P ≠ NP). Similarly, the complexity of (exactly) counting retractions from G to H is classified (assuming FP ≠ #P). However, almost nothing is known about approximately counting retractions. Our first contribution is to give a complete trichotomy for approximately counting retractions to graphs without short cycles. The result is as follows: (1) Approximately counting retractions to a graph H of girth at least 5 is in FP if every connected component of H is a star, a single looped vertex, or an edge with two loops. (2) Otherwise, if every component is an irreflexive caterpillar or a partially bristled reflexive path, then approximately counting retractions to H is equivalent to approximately counting the independent sets of a bipartite graph—a problem that is complete in the approximate counting complexity class RH Π 1. (3) Finally, if none of these hold, then approximately counting retractions to H is equivalent to approximately counting the satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula. Our second contribution is to locate the retraction counting problem for each H in the complexity landscape of related approximate counting problems. Interestingly, our results are in contrast to the situation in the exact counting context. We show that the problem of approximately counting retractions is separated both from the problem of approximately counting homomorphisms and from the problem of approximately counting list homomorphisms—whereas for exact counting all three of these problems are interreducible. We also show that the number of retractions is at least as hard to approximate as both the number of surjective homomorphisms and the number of compactions. In contrast, exactly counting compactions is the hardest of all of these exact counting problems.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1145/3397472

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Computer Science
Oxford college:
New College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6895-755X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Computer Science
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1879-6089
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Computer Science
Oxford college:
Jesus College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Association for Computing Machinery
Journal:
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory More from this journal
Volume:
12
Issue:
3
Pages:
15:1 - 15:43
Article number:
15
Publication date:
2020-06-01
Acceptance date:
2020-03-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1942-3462
ISSN:
1942-3454


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1097344
Local pid:
pubs:1097344
Deposit date:
2020-03-29
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP