Journal article icon

Journal article

Nudges in a post-truth world

Abstract:
Nudges—policy proposals informed by work in behavioural economics and psychology that are designed to lead to better decision-making or better behaviour—are controversial. Critics allege that they bypass our deliberative capacities, thereby undermining autonomy and responsible agency. In this paper, I identify a kind of nudge I call a nudge to reason, which make us more responsive to genuine evidence. I argue that at least some nudges to reason do not bypass our deliberative capacities. Instead, use of these nudges should be seen as appeals to mechanisms partially constitutive of these capacities, and therefore as benign (so far as autonomy and responsible agency are concerned). I sketch some concrete proposals for nudges to reason which are especially important given the apparent widespread resistance to evidence seen in recent political events.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/medethics-2017-104153

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
Journal of Medical Ethics More from this journal
Volume:
43
Issue:
8
Pages:
495-500
Publication date:
2017-05-19
Acceptance date:
2017-04-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1473-4257
ISSN:
0306-6800


Pubs id:
pubs:689994
UUID:
uuid:c2d33ba5-f3c6-4843-b710-05a2d0ba2741
Local pid:
pubs:689994
Deposit date:
2017-04-19
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP