Thesis icon

Thesis

Unseen influence: the diffusion of human rights law from the European Union to China

Abstract:
In the current crisis of multilateralism, there appears to be little room for legal influences among international actors, especially among those with alternative governance systems. However, this thesis unveils the EU's imprint on human rights law and policy in the People's Republic of China, explaining how and why this influence is taking place in such a seemingly closed legal system and in such a sensitive area.

Following case studies and drawing on scholarship on legal diffusion, the thesis develops a theoretical framework that includes both Chinese and EU perspectives and integrates top-down and bottom-up dynamics. Human rights law diffuses from the EU through three interconnected modes. In the multilateral mode, the EU influences international norms, for example through participation in treaty-making, which are then implemented in China. In the bilateral mode, Brussels advocates human rights reforms through instruments vis-à-vis Beijing, such as mutual learning platforms or conditionality in the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. In the unilateral mode, the EU implements its own instruments, like laws with an external reach or sanctions, which have an impact on the legal and policy framework in China.

However, this influence is happening because China wants it to, with the EU having limited control over the process. Beijing only adopts human rights norms that promote socio-economic development and reinforce political stability and territorial unity, ultimately seeking to strengthen the legitimacy of the Communist Party-led regime within Chinese society. Otherwise, norms are rejected, repurposed or superficially adopted. This selective filtering is rooted in China's socialist approach to human rights, which emphasises statism, legal instrumentalism and the prioritisation of the collective over the individual. As a result, more legal norms related to social, economic, cultural, environmental and digital rights are readily diffused than those concerning civil and political rights.

Actions

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Oxford college:
Hertford College
Role:
Author

Contributors

Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Oxford college:
St Hugh's College
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
0000-0002-7068-5186


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/025qq4838
Programme:
Ayuda predoctoral del Gobierno de Navarra 2022


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP