Journal article
Our evolving beliefs about evolved misbelief
- Abstract:
- The commentaries raise a host of challenging issues and reflect a broad range of views. Some commentators doubt that there is any convincing evidence for adaptive misbelief, and remain (in our view, unduly) wedded to our "default presumption" that misbelief is maladaptive. Others think that the evidence for adaptive misbelief is so obvious, and so widespread, that the label "default presumption" is disingenuous. We try to chart a careful course between these opposing perspectives.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 261.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0140525X09991555
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences More from this journal
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 541-561
- Publication date:
- 2009-12-01
- Edition:
- Accepted Manuscript
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-1825
- ISSN:
-
0140-525X
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:7bb6f522-9738-4d79-9433-1118a0dfa8a9
- Local pid:
-
ora:3477
- Deposit date:
-
2010-03-09
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2010
- Rights statement:
- © Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991555
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record