Thesis icon

Thesis

Religious atavism and the climate crisis, with reference to Taylor and Rorty on liberalism

Abstract:

Climate change is often seen as the basis for new grand narratives of Western modernity, but grand narratives in themselves are unstable under the conditions of postsecularity in liberal democracies. By a widely accepted form of deflationary critique through analogy to religion, nominally secular worldviews are susceptible to genealogical redescription in terms of pre-liberal, theological antecedents in Western history. This thesis finds critical resources in theorists of liberalism for reading accounts of climate crisis – that put climate at the centre of contemporary Western self-understanding – as expressions of religious atavism.

Charles Taylor’s genealogical account of secular liberalism provides a framework for understanding climatological claims of transcendental significance. On a Taylorian reading, the reality of climate crisis is perceived, phenomenologically, to repudiate the principle of ‘mutual benefit’ on which the modern moral order of liberal societies depends. Through its ontic validation of liberal-democratic malaise, climate crisis becomes a quasi-transcendental source of guidance and impetus for radical ideas in politics, theory, and culture.

The concept of atavism is suggested in particular by Richard Rorty’s postsecular and historicist view of philosophy as cultural politics. On Rorty’s quietist account, the world-historical magnitude of climate crisis is felt to be a cultural ‘skyhook’ – a foundational source that may be critically redescribed as a vestige of monotheistic dependency. The Rortyan view finds no need of more-than-human validation for utopian speculation, bringing into question the tendency of climate crisis to be invoked as a warrant for broadscale intellectual, social, and political radicalism.

The concurrent conception of climate crisis from both impartial scientific reason and highly conditional ‘malaises of modernity’ is linked to long-standing tensions in the Enlightenment legacy of liberal democracies. Revisionary programmes from climate crisis are thus both powerful and limited: while credible and moving, they nevertheless remain open to Nietzschean critiques of cultural nihilism.

Actions


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology Faculty
Oxford college:
St Cross College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-3227

Contributors

Institution:
Imperial College London
Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8166-5917
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology Faculty
Oxford college:
Trinity College
Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-0711
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology Faculty
Oxford college:
Campion Hall
Role:
Examiner
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-6910
Institution:
University of Cambridge
Role:
Examiner
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3886-4114


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP