Que(e)rying artificial intelligence use for infectious disease surveillance: the need for a reparative algorithmic praxis

Journal article

The increasing likelihood of pandemics highlights the need for superior tools at our disposal. By robustly and efficiently analyzing vast datasets, artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to help decision-makers better respond to, manage, and even avert infectious disease outbreaks. However, these systems could also stigmatize, discriminate, exclude, exploit, and/or otherwise oppress vulnerable populations. In doing so, they could amplify allocative and representational harms. Given the possible far-reaching consequences, critical ethical reflection and oversight are essential. Such reflection would be incomplete without considering the impacts on queer people. From HIV/AIDS to COVID-19, outbreaks have disproportionately affected sexual and gender minorities (SGMs), reflecting a long history of structural oppression and injustices. AI could further exacerbate inequalities—like anti-queer bias—particularly amid the omission of marginalized and minoritized perspectives from algorithmic fairness efforts. Adopting an Intersectional, reparative approach, this paper que(e)ries the use of AI for infectious disease surveillance purposes. Placing this technology within patterns of power, privilege, marginalization, and disadvantage, it interrogates how to achieve algorithmic justice for SGMs. It proposes concrete steps towards a reparative algorithmic praxis, including: (1) exploring how these systems reproduce inequalities, (2) centering sexual and gender diversity to disrupt problematic epistemic positions, and (3) combating opacity through participatory governance mechanisms. This work is necessary to understand how AI systems reproduce major health disparities and hold them accountable. By contemplating how to begin redressing harms, it offers a starting point for further deliberation and action towards inclusive, justice-oriented algorithmic systems in practice. I anticipate these lessons being deeply transferrable across contexts.

Authors: Racine, EE

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Journal: Big Data and Society
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Article number: 20539517241289440
• Publication date: 2025-03-18
• Acceptance date: 2024-12-01
• DOI: 10.1177/20539517241289440
• EISSN: 2053-9517
• Language: English
• Keywords: intersectionality; infectious diseases; artificial intelligence; algorithmic bias; algorithmic reparations; queer theory