Thesis icon

Thesis

Collegiality and religious authority in the Roman Republic

Abstract:
This thesis explores collective action and shared authority in the political and religious spheres of the Roman Republic, both as ideas and practice. Specifically, it addresses the prevalence and nature of collegiality – officials sharing duties and exercising the same, common, or even theoretically equal powers – as an organisational principle within Roman political and religious institutions. It aims to develop a new approach to practices of cooperation, consensus, and power-sharing in Roman public life, in general. Collegiality is often used to define and demarcate the beginning and end of the Roman Republic (509–43), through the supposed primacy of the dual consuls, and is central to modern explanations and models of republican political history. Despite its pervasiveness, few scholars have attempted to define what collegiality is, in any or all of its forms, in its own right. Instead, they tend to foreground function, and focus on its purpose and usefulness for Roman governance and administration. This thesis will demonstrate that collegiality is more complex than this lack of direct attention in current scholarship suggests. A comprehensive analysis of how the Romans viewed and engaged with this concept would clarify how Roman republican society functioned at an intrinsic level and, consequently, is highly desirable. Collegiality and collective authority were essential to the operation of the entire Roman state, witnessed in the Senate, magistracies, and priesthoods. Furthermore, collegiality was at the forefront of many Late Republican and early imperial authors’ minds as they sought to describe and explain their mythological and constitutional past. Beyond simple functionality, collegiality, with its assumptions about cooperation and responsibility, turns out to be critical to understanding Roman society overall. This study addresses the questions of how and why collegiality was so significant to the Romans. In doing so, it contributes to our understanding of Roman political and religious institutions, breaks down the artificial boundaries between political, religious, and cultural history, and presents fresh perspectives on other comparable behaviours across the Roman world.

Actions

Access Document

Files:

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Classics
Sub department:
Ancient Hist & Classical Arch
Oxford college:
Wadham College
Role:
Author

Contributors

Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Classics
Sub department:
Ancient Hist & Classical Arch
Oxford college:
St John's College
Role:
Supervisor


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00892tw58
Funding agency for:
Webb, K
Programme:
John Crampton Travelling Scholarship


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
Pubs id:
1991740
Local pid:
pubs:1991740
Deposit date:
2024-04-20
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP