Thesis icon

Thesis

Transhumanist aspirations for accelerating insight: a philosophical and theological critique

Abstract:
Transhumanism has been increasing in importance as a subject of interdisciplinary scholarship for philosophy and theology. In this thesis, I argue that the transhumanist aspiration to cognitive enhancement is not well founded due to the movement’s inadequate treatment of the related concepts of insight and understanding. Although understanding and insight have received at least some philosophical and theological exploration, little has been done to examine how these issues pertain to transhumanist aspirations. This thesis aims to address this omission. I develop this argument by presenting the analyses of cognition and its enhancement as presented by three representative transhumanists: Marvin Minsky, Ray Kurzweil, and Nick Bostrom. I present, in contrast to the transhumanist view, the philosophical perspectives of Bernard Lonergan and Michael Polanyi and the theological perspective of Thomas Aquinas. This thesis also draws from philosophical and psychological research on metaphor, narrative, and joint attention. I then analyse the transhumanist positions of Minsky, Kurzweil, and Bostrom in light of these philosophical and theological perspectives. The conclusion reached is that the transhumanist perspectives have an inadequate appreciation of insight and understanding, especially when contrasted with the alternative perspectives of Lonergan, Polanyi, and Aquinas. These inadequacies explain why three of the most articulate and philosophically sophisticated transhumanists fail. This thesis thus proposes a benchmark by which transhumanist accounts need to be assessed and raises ground for doubting the attractiveness of transhumanism generally. The philosophical and theological perspective sdiscussed also point toward an alternative conception of technologically enhancing human cognition that respects the full reality of insight and understanding.

Actions

Access Document

Files:

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology and Religion
Oxford college:
Blackfriars
Role:
Author

Contributors

Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology and Religion
Research group:
Iam Ramsey Centre
Oxford college:
Harris Manchester College
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology and Religion
Oxford college:
Harris Manchester College
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
Saint Louis University
Role:
Examiner
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Theology and Religion
Oxford college:
Oriel College
Role:
Examiner


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP