Thesis icon

Thesis

Against comparativism about mass in Newtonian Gravity - a case study in the metaphysics of scale

Abstract:

This thesis concerns the metaphysics of scale. It investigates the implications of a physical determinable being dimensionful. In particular, it considers the case study of mass, as it features within Newtonian Gravity. Nevertheless, most of the terminology, methodology and arguments developed should be relatively straightforwardly applicable to other determinables and theories.

Weak Absolutism about mass holds that mass ratios obtain in virtue of absolute masses. Weak Comparativism denies this. In the first five chapters I argue in favour of Weak Absolutism over Weak Comparativism. The sixth chapter argues against reducing mass to other non-mass facts. The overall conclusion is Strong Absolutism about mass within Newtonian Gravity: mass ratios obtain in virtue of absolute masses, which themselves are fundamental (i.e. they do not require anything further in order to obtain).

Comparativism promises to recover all the virtues of absolutism, in particular its empirical adequacy, but at a lower 'metaphysical cost'. Special attention is given to Dasgupta's recent comparativist proposal. Dasgupta interprets the requirement of empirical adequacy in terms of the undetectability of the absolute mass scale. I argue that undetectability is an unsuitable way of understanding empirical adequacy and that we would do better to understand it in terms of a theory's ability to correctly generate the set of empirically possible worlds (or at least the actual world). I refute Dasgupta's comparativism both on my terms and on his own terms. I subsequently develop and strongly criticise alternative versions of comparativism. Chapter five sheds doubt on the supposed 'metaphysical parsimony' of comparativism.

This debate should be of particular interest to readers who engage with the substantivalism-relationalism debate. These debates are much more entwined than previously acknowledged, which provides a significant source of mutual inspiration, although I do also draw out some important disanalogies.

Actions


Access Document


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Oxford college:
Magdalen College
Role:
Author

Contributors

Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Oxford college:
Oriel College
Role:
Supervisor
Department:
University of Southern California
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Oxford college:
Balliol College
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Oxford college:
Brasenose College
Role:
Examiner
Department:
University of Birmingham
Role:
Examiner


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
UUID:
uuid:3f98e412-2cf7-4810-8a3a-0041f9c1c5df
Deposit date:
2017-09-07

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP