Thesis
To be poor and Appalachian: a mixed methods, multi-scale account of multidimensional poverty in the Appalachian mountains
- Abstract:
-
How ought Appalachian poverty be understood and measured? Through the lens of Amartya Sen’s capability approach, I consider the topic of multidimensional poverty in central Appalachia, a mountainous region in the southeastern United States with a long history of coal extraction. By combining participatory, ethnographic, and quantitative methods, I translate the lived experiences of my subjects into measures and analyses that are ‘legible’ to popular audiences and relevant to policy.
In attending to the experiences of my subjects, I traverse four conceptual scales that they deemed relevant to their deprivations: the household, the community, the subregional, and the individual. At the household-level, I construct a participatory poverty measure, trial it using a small sample of households, and leverage my results to assess the interlinkages between social relationships and poverty. Observing that the household perspective is insufficient to explain my subjects’ experiences, I propose a conceptual framework for estimating deprivations at the community-level, develop a community measure for my field site, and qualitatively trace how these communities have changed over time. I then consider the subregional, ‘mezzo’ perspective by studying the quantitative relationship between community disadvantage and remoteness, but I then contextualize these findings by considering the ongoing trend of Appalachian city dissolution through a comparative case study. I finally return to the individual-level by providing a qualitative, dimension-by dimension account of Appalachian poverty, thereby demonstrating the construct validity of my measures. In doing so, I consider how the deprivations identified by my subjects experientially and contextually interface with their capabilities. Ultimately, my research develops a mixed methods, multi-scale account of multidimensional poverty in Appalachia that is embedded into capability theory and human experience alike, while also responding to the region’s larger histories and social structures.
Actions
Authors
Contributors
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Division:
- SSD
- Department:
- International Development
- Role:
- Supervisor
- DOI:
- Type of award:
- DPhil
- Level of award:
- Doctoral
- Awarding institution:
- University of Oxford
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- Deposit date:
-
2025-05-09
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Samuel McQuillen
- Copyright date:
- 2025
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record