Journal article
Furthering the language hypothesis of alexithymia: An integrated review and meta-analysis
- Abstract:
- Alexithymia, including the inability to identify and express one’s own feelings, is a subclinical condition responsible for some of the socioemotional symptoms seen across a range of psychiatric conditions. The language hypothesis of alexithymia posits a language-mediated disruption in the development of discrete emotion concepts from ambiguous affective states, exacerbating the risk of developing alexithymia in language-impaired individuals. To provide a critical evaluation, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies of language functioning in alexithymia was performed. A modest association was found between alexithymia and multi-domain language deficits (r = -.14), including structural language, pragmatics, and propensity to use emotional language. A more theoretically-relevant subsample analysis comparing alexithymia levels in language-impaired and typical individuals revealed larger effects, but a limited number of studies adopted this approach. A synthesis of 11 emotional granularity studies also found an association between alexithymia and reduced emotional granularity (r = -.10). Language impairments seem to increase the risk of alexithymia. Heterogeneous samples and methods suggest the need for studies with improved alexithymia assessments.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 6.7MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews More from this journal
- Volume:
- 141
- Article number:
- 104864
- Publication date:
- 2022-09-08
- Acceptance date:
- 2022-09-04
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0149-7634
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1277147
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1277147
- Deposit date:
-
2022-09-05
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Lee et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record