Journal article icon

Journal article

Severe maternal morbidity in the high income setting: a systematic review of composite definitions

Abstract:

Background: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is an important indicator for the improvement of maternity care. Measurement of SMM varies, limiting global comparisons. To promote concordance we studied how SMM has been defined in epidemiological practice.

Methods: Comprehensive composite definitions of SMM in pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postnatal that captured both obstetric and non-obstetric processes in high-income settings were identified through a prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42023421377) systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar 01/01/1993–31/08/2024. Clinical concepts, diagnostic and procedural codes captured by definitions of SMM were compared and the variation between definitions was described.

Findings: The initial search identified 7852 records and 40 studies were included: 28 studies that reported 32 definitions of SMM for use with administrative data, with median incidence of 11.4/1000, and 13 studies that reported 13 definitions for use with the primary medical record, with median SMM incidence of 6.7/1000. The majority of definitions included cardiac, respiratory, and renal dysfunction or failure; haemorrhagic, thrombotic or infective morbidity; and critical interventions. Up to 75% of cases of SMM under some definitions involved transfusion. The main source of variation between definitions was the selection and definition of common obstetric diagnoses. Variation in the sources of additional routine data required to construct a definition also limited comparability.

Interpretation: Despite common approaches to defining SMM, there are opportunities to improve comparability. No two definitions for use with administrative data in different settings involved a similar incidence and set of components and involved a similar distribution of components among cases. Harmonization of the purpose, constituent codes, and sources of data would facilitate comparisons between maternity systems.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103105

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2967-0406
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
EClinicalMedicine More from this journal
Volume:
81
Article number:
103105
Publication date:
2025-02-13
Acceptance date:
2025-01-24
DOI:
EISSN:
2589-5370


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2084138
Local pid:
pubs:2084138
Deposit date:
2025-02-06
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP