Journal article
Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
- Abstract:
-
Background
The Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial (TOPKAT) aimed to evaluate the difference between total knee replacement (TKR) and partial (unicompartmental) replacement (PKR) for treatment of late-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. As longevity is a key issue for joint replacement, extended follow-up periods are required to fully evaluate the long-term efficacy. In this analysis, we report the 10-year follow-up of the TOPKAT trial.
MethodsExpand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 4.1MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00250-4
Authors
+ NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/03d7d0579
- Grant:
- 08/14/08
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Lancet Rheumatology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- e116-e126
- Publication date:
- 2025-11-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-08-18
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2665-9913
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2284306
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2284306
- Deposit date:
-
2025-09-17
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Beard et al
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record