Journal article icon

Journal article

Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Abstract:
Background
The Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial (TOPKAT) aimed to evaluate the difference between total knee replacement (TKR) and partial (unicompartmental) replacement (PKR) for treatment of late-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. As longevity is a key issue for joint replacement, extended follow-up periods are required to fully evaluate the long-term efficacy. In this analysis, we report the 10-year follow-up of the TOPKAT trial.
Methods Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00250-4

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Oxford college:
Kellogg College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7884-6389
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4156-6989

Contributors

Role:
Contributor


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03d7d0579
Grant:
08/14/08


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Lancet Rheumatology More from this journal
Volume:
8
Issue:
2
Pages:
e116-e126
Publication date:
2025-11-18
Acceptance date:
2025-08-18
DOI:
EISSN:
2665-9913


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2284306
Local pid:
pubs:2284306
Deposit date:
2025-09-17
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP