‘The economy is rigged’: inequality narratives, fairness, and support for redistribution in six countries

Journal article

Do narratives about the causes of inequality influence support for redistribution? Scholarship suggests that information about levels of inequality does not easily shift redistributive attitudes. We embed information about inequality within a commentary article depicting the economy as being rigged to advantage elites, a common populist narrative of both the left and right. Drawing on the media effects and political economy literatures, we expect articles employing narratives that portray inequality as the consequence of systemic unfairness to increase demands for redistribution. We test this proposition via an online survey experiment with 7,426 respondents in Australia, France, Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Our narrative treatment significantly increases attitudes favoring redistribution in five of the countries. In the US the treatment has no effect. We consider several reasons for the non-result in the US – highlighting beliefs about government inefficiency – and conclude by discussing general implications of our findings.

Authors: Culpepper, P; Shandler, R; Jung, J-H; Lee, T

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Journal: Comparative Political Studies
• Publication date: 2024-05-13
• Acceptance date: 2024-03-14
• DOI: 10.1177/00104140241252072
• EISSN: 1552-3829
• ISSN: 0010-4140
• Language: English
• Keywords: experimental research; political economy; redistribution; media effects; inequality