Journal article
When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
- Abstract:
- Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 300.4KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 389.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmj.i3507
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ More from this journal
- Volume:
- 354
- Article number:
- i3507
- Publication date:
- 2016-07-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-26
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1756-1833
- ISSN:
-
0959-8138
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:635527
- UUID:
-
uuid:f8e5daf9-144f-4231-b221-5426083c4e57
- Local pid:
-
pubs:635527
- Source identifiers:
-
635527
- Deposit date:
-
2016-08-01
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Rights statement:
- © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
- Notes:
- This article has a correction. Please see: https://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4853
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record