Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Utility of healthcare-worker-targeted antimicrobial stewardship interventions in hospitals of low- and lower-middle-income countries: a scoping review of systematic reviews

Abstract:

Background

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives in hospitals often include the implementation of clustered intervention components to improve the surveillance and targeting of antibiotics. However, impacts of the individual components of AMS interventions are not well known, especially in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs).

Objective

A scoping review was conducted to summarize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) on the impact of common hospital-implemented healthcare-worker-targeted components of AMS interventions that may be appropriate for LLMICs.

Methods

Major databases were searched systematically for SRs of AMS interventions that were evaluated in hospitals. For SRs to be eligible, they had to report on at least one intervention that could be categorized according to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy. Clinical and process outcomes were considered. Primary studies from LLMICs were consulted for additional information.

Results

Eighteen SRs of the evaluation of intervention components met the inclusion criteria. The evidence shows that audit and feedback, and clinical practice guidelines improved several clinical and process outcomes in hospitals. An unintended consequence of interventions was an increase in the use of antibiotics. There was a cumulative total of 547 unique studies, but only 2% (N=12) were conducted in hospitals in LLMICs. Two studies in LLMICs reported that guidelines and educational meetings were effective in hospitals.

Conclusion

Evidence from high- and upper-middle-income countries suggests that audit and feedback, and clinical practice guidelines have the potential to improve various clinical and process outcomes in hospitals. The lack of evidence in LLMIC settings prevents firm conclusions from being drawn, and highlights the need for further research.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.008

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
ContEd
Department:
Continuing Education
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8532-2513
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
GLAM
Department:
Science and Medicine Subject Area
Sub department:
Health Care Libraries
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1142-6440


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Journal of Hospital Infection More from this journal
Volume:
131
Pages:
43-53
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2022-09-18
Acceptance date:
2022-09-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1532-2939
ISSN:
0195-6701
Pmid:
36130626


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
1281560
Local pid:
pubs:1281560
Deposit date:
2024-05-15
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP