Journal article icon

Journal article

The benefits and harms of oral iron supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:
Background
Iron deficiency during pregnancy poses a significant risk to both maternal and foetal health. Current international guidelines provide discrepant advice on antenatal iron supplementation for non-anaemic women.
Objective
We aimed to quantify the benefits and harms of routine antenatal supplementation in non-anaemic women.
Methods
The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing oral iron supplementation with placebo or no supplement in non-anaemic pregnant women. Risk of bias was assessed for each study and the results were synthesized via meta-analysis.
Results
Twenty-three eligible studies were identified with 4492 non-anaemic pregnant women. Supplemented groups had higher haemoglobin [mean difference = 6.95 g/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.81–9.09, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 91%] and ferritin (mean difference = 12.22 ng/ml, 95% CI: 6.92–17.52, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 87%) and were at lower risk of anaemia (relative risk = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34–0.74, P < .001, high certainty, I2 = 42%, number needed to treat (NNT) = 10). There was no difference in birth weight, preterm birth, and rate of caesarean section. Reporting on harms was inconsistent and there was insufficient evidence to determine an association between iron supplements and any negative outcome.
Discussion
Prophylactic iron supplementation likely results in a large reduction in maternal anaemia during pregnancy. Future research should qualify the impact of this benefit on women’s quality of life and determine which subpopulations benefit most. Evidence surrounding the harms of iron supplementation in the non-anaemic population is poor quality and inconsistent. Randomized controlled trials quantifying the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance and iron overload are essential to inform iron supplement use and reduce unwarranted variations in international guidelines.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/fampra/cmae079

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7572-4586
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0005-9779-1017
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4162-201X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Research group:
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7008-8763
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Research group:
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2101-0390


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Family Practice More from this journal
Volume:
42
Issue:
1
Article number:
cmae079
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2025-01-21
Acceptance date:
2024-12-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1460-2229
ISSN:
0263-2136
Pmid:
39834271


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2080807
Local pid:
pubs:2080807
Deposit date:
2025-02-25
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP