Journal article icon

Journal article

Model simulations capture seasonal Arctic Haze and clean-air cycle better than satellite and reanalysis

Abstract:
The Arctic is heating far more rapidly than the global mean, and clarifying the influence of aerosols in this intensification demands accurate and reliable observational records. The Arctic exhibits a distinct seasonal aerosol cycle, springtime ”Arctic Haze” with elevated AOD and summertime “Clean Air” with low AOD. Thus, it is critical to evaluate how well various datasets capture this seasonality relative to ground-based observations. This study analyzes spring and summer AOD variability using CAMSRA and MERRA-2 reanalyses, MODIS Terra and Aqua satellite observations, AERONET measurements, AEROSNOW retrievals, and GEOS-Chem model simulations. Results show that satellite-derived and satellite-assimilated reanalyses are far from capturing the expected seasonal Arctic Haze and Clean Air pattern, except at Bonanza Creek and Yakutsk, where anthropogenic pollution alters it. The inability of reanalyses to capture Arctic aerosol seasonality likely stems from the assimilation of satellite retrievals influenced by cloud contamination and surface reflection from snow and ice, as well as inherent biases in the underlying models used to generate these datasets. In contrast, AERONET observations and GEOS-Chem simulations consistently capture Arctic Haze in spring, driven by long-range transport, and Clean Air in summer, associated with efficient wet removal of aerosols. CAMSRA further underestimates emissions from Arctic forest fires and inadequately represents long-range pollution transport. These findings suggest that independent model simulations align more closely with ground-based observations than satellite products or reanalyses, and that adjusting wet-scavenging parameters to fit such reanalyses may misrepresent aerosol processes and their contribution to Arctic warming. Incorporating advanced retrieval algorithms like AEROSNOW into reanalyses offers a pathway to reduce these biases and improve representation of Arctic aerosol seasonality.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Physics - Central
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Physics - Central
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Nature Research
Journal:
Scientific Reports More from this journal
Volume:
15
Issue:
1
Article number:
42934
Publication date:
2025-12-01
Acceptance date:
2025-11-14
DOI:
EISSN:
2045-2322
ISSN:
2045-2322


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2341870
UUID:
uuid_f780a71b-a63d-4264-a523-070a539c482c
Local pid:
pubs:2341870
Source identifiers:
3527424
Deposit date:
2025-12-02
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP