Journal article icon

Journal article

The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials

Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Brief automated messages have the potential to support self-management in people with type 2 diabetes, but their effect compared with usual care is unclear.

OBJECTIVES
To examine the effectiveness of interventions to change lifestyle behavior delivered via automated brief messaging in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS
A systematic literature review of controlled trials examined the impact of interventions, delivered by brief messaging and intended to promote lifestyle change in people with type 2 diabetes, on behavioral and clinical outcomes. Bibliographic databases searched included Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ISI WoK. Two reviewers independently screened citations. We extracted information on study risk of bias, setting (high versus lowand middle-income countries) and intervention characteristics (including use of theory and behavior change techniques). Outcome measures included acceptability of the interventions and their impact on: i) determinants of lifestyle behavior (knowledge about diabetes, selfefficacy, attitudes towards self-management), ii) lifestyle behavior (diet, physical activity) and, iii) clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Where possible, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses to obtain estimates of effect size of intervention compared to usual care.

RESULTS
We identified 15 trials (15 interventions). Most interventions were delivered via shortmessage-service text-messaging (n=12) and simultaneously targeted diet and physical activity (n=11). Nine interventions consisted of unidirectional messages, whereas six consisted of bidirectional messages, with patients receiving automated tailored feedback based on selfreported data. The acceptability of the interventions and their impact on lifestyle behavior and its determinants was examined in a low proportion of trials, with heterogeneous results being observed. In 13 trials (1155 patients) where data were available there was a difference in glycated hemoglobin of -0.53% (95%CI, –0.59% to -0.47%) between intervention groups compared to usual care. In five trials (406 patients) there was a non-significant difference in body mass index of -0.25 kg/m2 (95%CI, -1.02 to 0.52). Interventions based on unidirectional messages produced similar effects in the outcomes examined than those based on bidirectional messages. Interventions conducted in low- and middle- income countries showed a greater impact than those conducted in high-income countries. In general, trials were not free of bias and did not use explicit theory.

CONCLUSIONS
Automated brief messages strategies can improve health outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes. Larger, methodologically robust trials are needed to confirm these positive results.
Publication status:
In press
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.2196/jmir.5425

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
GLAM
Department:
Science and Medicine Subject Area
Sub department:
Health Care Libraries
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Farmer, A
Grant:
Senior Investigator Award


Publisher:
Journal of Medical Internet Research Publications
Journal:
Journal of Medical Internet Research More from this journal
Publication date:
2016-01-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1438-8871
ISSN:
1439-4456


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:598450
UUID:
uuid:f7598cbc-6c66-492f-96e8-e87568e4e8f4
Local pid:
pubs:598450
Source identifiers:
598450
Deposit date:
2016-02-01
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP