Journal article icon

Journal article

Reproducibility of arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow image processing: a report of the ISMRM open science initiative for perfusion imaging (OSIPI) and the ASL MRI challenge

Abstract:

Purpose: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a widely used contrast-free MRI method for assessing cerebral blood flow (CBF). Despite the generally adopted ASL acquisition guidelines, there is still wide variability in ASL analysis. We explored this variability through the ISMRM-OSIPI ASL-MRI Challenge, aiming to establish best practices for more reproducible ASL analysis.

Methods: Eight teams analyzed the challenge data, which included a high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical image and 10 pseudo-continuous ASL datasets simulated using a digital reference object to generate ground-truth CBF values in normal and pathological states. We compared the accuracy of CBF quantification from each team's analysis to the ground truth across all voxels and within predefined brain regions. Reproducibility of CBF across analysis pipelines was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), limits of agreement (LOA), and replicability of generating similar CBF estimates from different processing approaches.

Results: Absolute errors in CBF estimates compared to ground-truth synthetic data ranged from 18.36 to 48.12 mL/100 g/min. Realistic motion incorporated into three datasets produced the largest absolute error and variability between teams, with the least agreement (ICC and LOA) with ground-truth results. Fifty percent of the submissions were replicated, and one produced three times larger CBF errors (46.59 mL/100 g/min) compared to submitted results.

Conclusions: Variability in CBF measurements, influenced by differences in image processing, especially to compensate for motion, highlights the significance of standardizing ASL analysis workflows. We provide a recommendation for ASL processing based on top-performing approaches as a step toward ASL standardization.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1002/mrm.30081

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8269-711X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0329-824X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Engineering Science
Sub department:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3201-6002


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
92
Issue:
2
Pages:
836-852
Place of publication:
United States
Publication date:
2024-03-19
Acceptance date:
2024-02-21
DOI:
EISSN:
1522-2594
ISSN:
0740-3194
Pmid:
38502108


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1865362
Local pid:
pubs:1865362
Deposit date:
2024-04-29
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP