Journal article icon

Journal article

Bayesian confidence in optimal decisions

Abstract:
The optimal way to make decisions in many circumstances is to track the difference in evidence collected in favour of the options. The drift diffusion model (DDM) implements this approach, and provides an excellent account of decisions and response times. However, existing DDM-based models of confidence exhibit certain deficits, and many theories of confidence have used alternative, non-optimal models of decisions. Motivated by the historical success of the DDM, we ask whether simple extensions to this framework might allow it to better account for confidence. Motivated by the idea that the brain will not duplicate representations of evidence, in all model variants decisions and confidence are based on the same evidence accumulation process. We compare the models to benchmark results, and successfully apply 4 qualitative tests concerning the relationships between confidence, evidence, and time, in a new preregistered study. Using computationally cheap expressions to model confidence on a trial-by-trial basis, we find that a subset of model variants also provide a very good to excellent account of precise quantitative effects observed in confidence data. Specifically, our results favour the hypothesis that confidence reflects the strength of accumulated evidence penalised by the time taken to reach the decision (Bayesian readout), with the penalty applied not perfectly calibrated to the specific task context. These results suggest there is no need to abandon the DDM or single accumulator models to successfully account for confidence reports.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1037/rev0000472

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author


Publisher:
American Psychological Association
Journal:
Psychological Review More from this journal
Volume:
131
Issue:
5
Pages:
114–1160
Publication date:
2024-07-18
Acceptance date:
2023-12-30
DOI:
EISSN:
1939-1471
ISSN:
0033-295X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1596716
Local pid:
pubs:1596716
Deposit date:
2024-01-08
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP