Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases.

So, S; Freeman, D; Dunn, G; Kapur, S; Kuipers, E; Bebbington, P; Fowler, D; Garety, P

Journal article

Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases.

Abstract:: Two reasoning biases, jumping to conclusions (JTC) and belief inflexibility, have been found to be associated with delusions. We examined these biases and their relationship with delusional conviction in a longitudinal cohort of people with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis. We hypothesized that JTC, lack of belief flexibility, and delusional conviction would form distinct factors, and that JTC and lack of belief flexibility would predict less change in delusional conviction over time. Two hundred seventy-three patients with delusions were assessed over twelve months of a treatment trial (Garety et al., 2008). Forty-one percent of the sample had 100% conviction in their delusions, 50% showed a JTC bias, and 50%-75% showed a lack of belief flexibility. Delusional conviction, JTC, and belief flexibility formed distinct factors although conviction was negatively correlated with belief flexibility. Conviction declined slightly over the year in this established psychosis group, whereas the reasoning biases were stable. There was little evidence that reasoning predicted the slight decline in conviction. The degree to which people believe their delusions, their ability to think that they may be mistaken and to consider alternative explanations, and their hastiness in decision making are three distinct processes although belief flexibility and conviction are related. In this established psychosis sample, reasoning biases changed little in response to medication or psychological therapy. Required now is examination of these processes in psychosis groups where there is greater change in delusion conviction, as well as tests of the effects on delusions when these reasoning biases are specifically targeted.

Publication status:: Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

So, S., Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Kapur, S., Kuipers, E., Bebbington, P., Fowler, D., & Garety, P. (2012). Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 129–139.

MLA Style

So, S., et al. “Jumping to Conclusions, a Lack of Belief Flexibility and Delusional Conviction in Psychosis: a Longitudinal Investigation of the Structure, Frequency, and Relatedness of Reasoning Biases.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 121, no. 1, 2012, pp. 129–39.

Chicago Style

So, S, D Freeman, G Dunn, S Kapur, E Kuipers, P Bebbington, D Fowler, and P Garety. 2012. “Jumping to Conclusions, a Lack of Belief Flexibility and Delusional Conviction in Psychosis: a Longitudinal Investigation of the Structure, Frequency, and Relatedness of Reasoning Biases.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121 (1): 129–39.
Share
Print