Journal article
Telephone assessment of cognition after transient ischemic attack and stroke: modified telephone interview of cognitive status and telephone Montreal cognitive assessment versus face-to-face Montreal cognitive assessment and neuropsychological battery
- Abstract:
-
Background and Purpose—
Face-to-face cognitive testing is not always possible in large studies. Therefore, we assessed the telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA: MoCA items not requiring pencil and paper or visual stimulus) and the modified Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICSm) against face-to-face cognitive tests in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke.
Methods—
In a population-based study, consecutive community-dwelling patients underwent the MoCA and neuropsychological battery >1 year after TIA or stroke, followed by T-MoCA (22 points) and TICSm (39 points) at least 1 month later. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was diagnosed using modified Petersen criteria and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) determined for T-MoCA and TICSm.
Results—
Ninety-one nondemented subjects completed neuropsychological testing (mean±SD age, 72.9±11.6 years; 54 males; stroke 49%) and 73 had telephone follow-up. MoCA subtest scores for repetition, abstraction, and verbal fluency were significantly worse (P<0.02) by telephone than during face-to-face testing. Reliability of diagnosis for MCI (AUC) were T-MoCA of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63–0.87) and TICSm of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68–0.90) vs face-to-face MoCA of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76–0.94). Optimal cutoffs were 18 to 19 for T-MoCA and 24 to 25 for TICSm. Reliability of diagnosis for MCI (AUC) was greater when only multi-domain impairment was considered (T-MoCA=0.85; 95% CI, 0.75–0.96 and TICSm=0.83, 95% CI, 0.70–0.96) vs face-to-face MoCA=0.87; 95% CI, 0.76–0.97).
Conclusions—
Both T-MoCA and TICSm are feasible and valid telephone tests of cognition after TIA and stroke but perform better in detecting multi-domain vs single-domain impairment. However, T-MoCA is limited in its ability to assess visuoexecutive and complex language tasks compared with face-to-face MoCA.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 197.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673384
Authors
- Publisher:
- American Heart Association
- Journal:
- Stroke More from this journal
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 227-229
- Publication date:
- 2012-11-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1524-4628
- ISSN:
-
0039-2499
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:377457
- UUID:
-
uuid:f4b9ff0a-7b65-4bd6-8c34-7739cdb78eec
- Local pid:
-
pubs:377457
- Source identifiers:
-
377457
- Deposit date:
-
2013-11-16
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- American Heart Association, Inc.
- Copyright date:
- 2012
- Rights statement:
- © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from American Heart Association at https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673384
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record