- Abstract:
-
Writers such as Stalnaker and Dummett have argued that specific features of subjunctive conditional statements undermine the principle of bivalence. This, paper is concerned with rebutting such claims. 1. It is shown how subjective conditionals pose a prima facie threat to bivalence, and how this threat can be dissolved by a distinction between the results of negating a subjective conditional and of negating its consequent. To make this distinction is to side with Lewis against Stalnaker in a...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher:
- Kluwer Academic Publishers Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Synthese Journal website
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 405-421
- Publication date:
- 1988-06-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-0964
- ISSN:
-
0039-7857
- URN:
-
uuid:f402a6fa-1edb-4c4d-a815-ae8fbe79e559
- Local pid:
- ora:5131
- Language:
- English
- Subjects:
- Copyright holder:
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Copyright date:
- 1988
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but the original publication is available at springerlink.com (which you may be able to access via the publisher copy link on this record page). Citation: Williamson, T. (1988). 'Bivalence and subjunctive conditionals', Synthese 75(3), 405-421. N.B. Tim Williamson is now based at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford.
Journal article
Bivalence and subjunctive conditionals
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record