Journal article icon

Journal article

Critical components of ‘Early Intervention in Psychosis’: national retrospective cohort study

Abstract:
Background: Psychotic disorders are severe mental health conditions frequently associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life and premature mortality. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely, comprehensive packages of care for people with psychotic disorders. However, it is not clear which components of EIP services contribute most to the improved outcomes they achieve. Aims: We aimed to identify associations between specific components of EIP care and clinically significant outcomes for individuals treated for early psychosis in England. Method: This national retrospective cohort study of 14 874 EIP individuals examined associations between 12 components of EIP care and outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, by linking data from the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP) to routine health outcome data held by NHS England. The primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as psychiatric inpatient admission or referral to a crisis resolution (home treatment) team. Secondary outcomes included duration of admissions, detention under the Mental Health Act, emergency department and general hospital attendances and mortality. We conducted multilevel regression analyses incorporating demographic and service-level covariates. Results: Smaller care coordinator case-loads and the use of clozapine for eligible people were associated with reduced relapse risk. Physical health interventions were associated with reductions in mortality risk. Other components, such as cognitive–behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), showed associations with improvements in secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Smaller case-loads should be prioritised and protected in EIP service design and delivery. Initiatives to improve the uptake of clozapine should be integrated into EIP care. Other components, such as CBTp and physical health interventions, may have specific benefits for those eligible. These findings highlight impactful components of care and should guide resource allocation to optimise EIP service delivery.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjp.2025.126

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8486-4903
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Sub department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Sub department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4662-8915


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
The British Journal of Psychiatry More from this journal
Pages:
1-9
Publication date:
2025-06-26
Acceptance date:
2025-04-03
DOI:
EISSN:
1472-1465
ISSN:
0007-1250


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
3055148
Deposit date:
2025-06-26
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP