Journal article

The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased.

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Senn, S. (2000). The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 321(7256), 297.

MLA Style

Senn, S. “The Quality of Systematic Reviews. Review Is Biased.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), vol. 321, no. 7256, 2000, p. 297.

Chicago Style

Senn, S. 2000. “The Quality of Systematic Reviews. Review Is Biased.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 321 (7256): 297.
Print

Access Document

Publisher copy:: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.297

Authors

+ Senn, S More by this author

Role:: Author

Journal:: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) More from this journal
Volume:: 321
Issue:: 7256
Pages:: 297
Publication date:: 2000-07-01
DOI:: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.297
EISSN:: 1756-1833
ISSN:: 0959-8138

Language:: English
Keywords:: Meta-Analysis as Topic

Software

Asthma

Humans
Pubs id:: pubs:237969
UUID:: uuid:f38cf087-a4e1-488b-9194-8d18a9712efd
Local pid:: pubs:237969
Source identifiers:: 237969
Deposit date:: 2012-12-19
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_f38cf087a4e1488b91948d18a9712efd

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 2000

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP