Journal article icon

Journal article

Field evaluation of quantitative point of care diagnostics to measure glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity

Abstract:

Background

Glucose-6-Phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common enzymopathy worldwide, no reliable bedside diagnostic tests to quantify G6PD activity exist. This study evaluated two novel quantitative G6PD diagnostics.

Methods

Participants with known G6PD activity were enrolled in Bangladesh. G6PD activity was measured by spectrophotometry, Biosensor (BS; AccessBio/CareStart, USA) and STANDARD G6PD (SG; SDBiosensor, ROK). G6PD activity was measured repeatedly in a subset of samples stored at room temperature and 4˚C.

Results

158 participants were enrolled, 152 samples tested by BS, 108 samples by SG and 102 samples were tested by all three methods. In comparison to spectrophotometry BS had sensitivity and specificity of 72% (95%CI: 53–86) and 100% (95%CI: 97–100) at 30% cut off respectively, while SG had a sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 88–100) and specificity of 97% (95%CI: 91–99) at the same cut off. The sensitivity and specificity at 70% cut off activity were 71% (95%CI: 59–82) and 98% (95%CI, 92–100) respectively for BS and 89% (95%CI: 77–96) and 93% (95%CI: 83–98) respectively for SG. When an optimal cut-off was applied the sensitivity of the BS at 70 cut off rose to 91% [95%CI: 80–96] and specificity to 82% [95%CI: 83–89]; a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of the SG (p = 0.879). G6PD activity dropped significantly (-0.31U/gHb, 95%CI: -0.61 to -0.01, p = 0.022) within 24 hours in samples stored at room temperature, but did not fall below 90% of baseline activity until day 13 (-0.87U/gHb, 95%CI: (-1.11 to -0.62), p<0.001).

Conclusion

BS and SG are the first quantitative diagnostics to measure G6PD activity reliably at the bedside and represent suitable alternatives to spectrophotometry in resource poor settings. If samples are stored at 4˚C, G6PD activity can be measured reliably for at least 7 days after sample collection.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pone.0206331

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8330-5499


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS One More from this journal
Volume:
13
Issue:
11
Pages:
e0206331
Publication date:
2018-11-02
Acceptance date:
2018-10-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1932-6203
ISSN:
1932-6203
Pmid:
30388146


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:942212
UUID:
uuid:f2ddc49a-0b09-4571-a862-448f638086f2
Local pid:
pubs:942212
Source identifiers:
942212
Deposit date:
2018-11-15

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP