Journal article icon

Journal article

Using health economic modelling to inform the design and development of an intervention: estimating the justifiable cost of weight loss maintenance in the UK

Abstract:
\ua9 2025 Hurley et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction: There are several known risks relating to poor nutrition during pregnancy, including the development of complications and poor birth outcomes. While food insecurity is associated with poorer nutrition, data on the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in pregnancy in the UK is lacking. This study aims to explore the prevalence, experiences and health impact of food insecurity in pregnancy in England to develop strategic recommendations for intervention strategies. Methods and analysis: Food, Pregnancy & Me is an observational, multi-method study. Questionnaires exploring diet quality, food security, mental health, and other health behaviours will be distributed to all women and pregnant people in their third trimester in two NHS Trusts in England (North East and West Midlands). Returned questionnaires (n=605) will be linked to routine maternal and birth outcome data and pseudo-anonymised. We will estimate the prevalence of food insecurity in pregnancy in these locations, associations with diet quality, maternal mental health, and pregnancy outcomes (e.g., pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes). Qualitative interviews (n=40) with participants identified as having experienced food insecurity will explore their lived experience, support received, and recommendations for additional support needs. Through a series of co-production workshops with local and national system shapers and experts by lived experience, we will use the data gathered to produce strategic recommendations for intervention with pregnant women and people facing food insecurity. We will then explore the potential costs and benefits of implementing the proposed recommendations. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 NHS Research Ethics Committee (24/NE/0027). Findings will be disseminated to key national and local system shapers and policy makers, advocacy groups, and the public through reports, presentations, the media and open access publications
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6358-0060
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8704-3262
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3982-4325
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5069-4758
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4189-8676


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Public Health More from this journal
Volume:
22
Issue:
1
Pages:
290-290
Article number:
290
Publication date:
2022-02-12
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-2458
ISSN:
1471-2458


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1241213
Local pid:
pubs:1241213
Source identifiers:
W4210964054
Deposit date:
2026-04-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP