Journal article icon

Journal article

Estimating the distributional impact of improving access to snake antivenom in urban and rural Lao People’s Democratic Republic: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis

Abstract:
Introduction: Snakebite is a significant public health issue in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR), with victims often seeking traditional healers due to inadequate antivenom supply and high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, contributing to inequities between urban and rural populations. Methods: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) was conducted to evaluate the distributional impact of improving access to antivenom in urban and rural Lao PDR, where all victims with systemic envenoming clinically indicated for antivenom receive antivenom at conventional hospitals, on disease burdens (deaths and disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and economic burden (%household OOP expenditure per monthly income). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Rural areas had higher mortality (3.14 vs. 0.35, +2.79 per 100,000 population), DALYs lost (78.97 vs. 8.86, +70.11 per 100,000 population), and household OOP expenses (39% vs. 38%, +1% of household monthly income) than urban areas. Full access to antivenom reduced health inequities in mortality (from +2.79 to +1.22 per 100,000 population) and DALYs (from +70.11 to +32.14 per 100,000 population) but increased inequities in household OOP expenses (from +1% to +39% of household monthly income). These differences had considerable uncertainties. Sensitivity analyses showed that free snakebite treatment and transportation costs with one caregiver reduced household OOP expenses in both areas (5% rural, 6% urban). Conclusions: While improving access to snake antivenom mitigates health inequities in disease burden, it exacerbates financial inequities between urban and rural areas. Policies targeting equitable access to care and financial protection are critical to achieving health equity for snakebites in the Lao PDR.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0014420

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases More from this journal
Volume:
20
Issue:
6
Pages:
e0014420
Article number:
e0014420
Publication date:
2026-06-04
Acceptance date:
2026-05-28
DOI:
EISSN:
1935-2735
ISSN:
1935-2727


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4233604
Deposit date:
2026-06-15
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP