Thesis icon

Thesis

Protecting the right to leave in an era of externalised migration control

Abstract:

This thesis explores the right to leave any country, including one’s own, in international law and its applicability to externalised migration control. Destination states and the European Union are employing a range of practices designed to prevent certain migrants leaving the state they are in and their irregular arrival, typically in cooperation with other states, private actors, and international organisations. Motivated by this phenomenon, this thesis focuses on the right to leave for migrants (including nationals seeking to leave their own state), which is fundamental on its own terms and in securing liberty and equality. It assesses the compatibility of key externalisation measures with the right and considers which actors bear responsibility for ensuing violations. Part I develops a general framework for determining whether restrictions conform with the right to leave, analysing the right’s scope and requirements and outlining corresponding obligations and duty-bearers. This shifts the focus onto challenging the traditional view that states have an almost unfettered right to exclude non-nationals, illustrating obligations to admit before demonstrating that the right to leave is exercisable irrespective of any right of entry. It then reveals the practical and legal necessity of the right for asylum seekers, appropriately formulated as a ‘right to leave to seek asylum’ and accompanied by several duties. Part II examines the law on jurisdiction and international responsibility. Applying the previous findings, Part III turns to externalisation, analysing the compatibility of visas, carrier sanctions, pushbacks, and pullbacks with the right to leave. It concludes that in most circumstances, such practices violate the right, with each actor responsible for their respective role. Overall, this thesis highlights the need for the primary contours of the right to be integrated into migration control policies and practices, compelling the dismantlement of many externalisation strategies and a re-imagining of the global (im)mobility infrastructure.

Actions


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Sub department:
Law Faculty
Oxford college:
Hertford College
Role:
Author

Contributors

Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
International Development
Sub department:
Refugee Studies Centre
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Sub department:
Law Faculty
Oxford college:
Jesus College
Role:
Supervisor
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Examiner
Institution:
The Graduate Institute Geneva
Role:
Examiner


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000697
Funding agency for:
McDonnell, EV
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010364
Funding agency for:
McDonnell, EV


Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP