Journal article icon

Journal article

External validation of a prognostic model to improve prediction of psychosis: a retrospective cohort study in primary care

Abstract:

Background: Early detection could reduce the duration of untreated psychosis. GPs are a vital part of the psychosis care pathway, but find it difficult to detect the early features. An accurate risk prediction tool, P Risk, was developed to detect these.

Aim: To externally validate P Risk.

Design and setting: This retrospective cohort study used a validation dataset of 1 647 934 UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care records linked to secondary care records.

Method: The same predictors (age; sex; ethnicity; social deprivation; consultations for suicidal behaviour, depression/anxiety, and substance misuse; history of consultations for suicidal behaviour; smoking history; substance misuse; prescribed medications for depression/anxiety/post-traumatic stress disorder/obsessive compulsive disorder; and total number of consultations) were used as for the development of P Risk. Predictive risk, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated for various risk thresholds. Discrimination (Harrell’s C-index) and calibration were calculated. Results were compared between the development (CPRD GOLD) and validation (CPRD Aurum) datasets.

Results: Psychosis risk increased with values of the P Risk prognostic index. Incidence was highest in younger age groups and, in the main, higher in males. Harrell’s C was 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.78 to 0.79) in the validation dataset and 0.77 in the development dataset. A risk threshold of 1.0% gave sensitivity of 65.9% and specificity of 86.6%.

Conclusion: Further testing is required, but P Risk has the potential to be used in primary care to detect future risk of psychosis.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2024.0017

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1446-8478
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7240-4563
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6392-6690
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5333-132X


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
74
Issue:
749
Pages:
e854-e860
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2024-11-28
Acceptance date:
2024-07-09
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643
Pmid:
39009415


Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP