Journal article

Non-inferiority and equivalence trials

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Ranstam, J., & Cook, J. A. (2017). Non-inferiority and equivalence trials. British Journal of Surgery, 104(11), 1578–1579.

MLA Style

Ranstam, J, and JA Cook. “Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Trials.” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 104, no. 11, 2017, pp. 1578–79.

Chicago Style

Ranstam, J, and JA Cook. 2017. “Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Trials.” British Journal of Surgery 104 (11): 1578–79.
Print

Access Document

Files:: Ramstam_2018_non-inferiority_and_equivalence.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 96.4KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1002/bjs.10243

Authors

+ Ranstam, J More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Cook, JA More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MSD
Department:: NDORMS
Sub department:: Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Oxford college:: St Hugh's College
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0002-4156-6989

Publisher:: Wiley
Journal:: British Journal of Surgery More from this journal
Volume:: 104
Issue:: 11
Pages:: 1578-1579
Publication date:: 2017-09-12
DOI:: 10.1002/bjs.10243
EISSN:: 1365-2168
ISSN:: 0007-1323
Pmid:: 28895139

Language:: English
Keywords:: humans

data interpretation, statistical

guideline adherence

randomized controlled trials as topic

models, statistical
Pubs id:: pubs:890115
UUID:: uuid:f18c6ff3-a45d-4cc1-b4a2-ac1287876c4f
Local pid:: pubs:890115
Source identifiers:: 890115
Deposit date:: 2018-08-02
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_f18c6ff3a45d4cc1b4a2ac1287876c4f

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: BJS Society Ltd
Copyright date:: 2017
Notes:: Copyright © 2017 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10243

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP