Journal article
Assessing the quality of research
- Abstract:
- Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 292.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ More from this journal
- Volume:
- 328
- Issue:
- 7430
- Pages:
- 39-41
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1468-5833
- ISSN:
-
0959-8138
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:f066dc44-1a65-4d42-bfb7-a4f614804265
- Local pid:
-
ora:970
- Deposit date:
-
2008-03-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Glasziou, P et al
- Copyright date:
- 2004
- Notes:
-
Citation: Glasziou, P., Vandenbroucke, J. P. & Chalmers, I. (2004) Assessing the quality of research. BMJ, 328 (7430), 39-41. Published by BMJ Publishing Group (http://www.bmj.com/).
BMJ Correction. "One of the authors of this Education and Debate article by Paul Glasziou and colleagues has advised us that his published name was missing his middle initial ( BMJ 2004;328: 39-41)[Free Full Text]. Jan Vandenbroucke is in fact Jan P Vandenbroucke."
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record