Journal article icon

Journal article

Global prevalence of psychosocial assessment following hospital-treated self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Hospital-treated self-harm is common, costly and associated with repeated self-harm and suicide. Providing a comprehensive psychosocial assessment following self-harm is recommended by professional bodies and may improve outcomes. AIMS: To review the provision of psychosocial assessments after hospital-presenting self-harm and the extent to which macro-level factors indicative of service provision explain variability in these estimates. METHOD: We searched five electronic databases to 3 January 2023 for studies reporting data on the proportion of patients and/or events that were provided a psychosocial assessment. Pooled weighted prevalence estimates were calculated with the random-effects model. Random-effects meta-regression was used to investigate between-study variability. RESULTS: 119 publications (69 unique samples) were included. Across ages, two-thirds of patients had a psychosocial assessment (0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.76). The proportion was higher for young people and older adults (0.75, 95% CI 0.36-0.99 and 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.00, respectively) compared with adults (0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.73). For events, around half of all presentations had these assessments across the age range. No macro-level factor explained between-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement in the universal provision of psychosocial assessments for self-harm. This represents a missed opportunity to review and tailor aftercare supports for those at risk. Given the marked unexplained heterogeneity between studies, the person- and system-level factors that influence provision of psychosocial assessments after self-harm should be studied further
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjo.2023.625

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1489-4573
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5901-4579
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1987-5299
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4878-0697


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100015742
Grant:
Prospect Fellowship
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100010635
Grant:
Burdekin Suicide Prevention Initiative
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000925
Grant:
1177787
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100019998
Grant:
Suicide Prevention Research Fund, PhD scholarships
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100001782
Grant:
Dame Kate Campbell Fellowship


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
BJPsych Open More from this journal
Volume:
10
Issue:
1
Pages:
e29-e29
Article number:
e29
Publication date:
2024-01-11
DOI:
EISSN:
2056-4724
ISSN:
2056-4724


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1607694
Local pid:
pubs:1607694
Source identifiers:
W4390743250
Deposit date:
2026-06-05
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP