Journal article
Secularity, sociology, and the contemporary history of Islam (Laïcité, sociologie et histoire contemporaine de l’islam)
- Abstract:
- This essay proposes to reframe the twentieth-century history of Islam by rethinking the relationship of that history to some dominant categories of twentieth century sociology, especially the secularization thesis. The global history of Islam since the late nineteenth century has been shaped by an apparent paradox between its two most significant features. The first of these has consisted of persistent calls for Muslim revival, reform, and unity across the world, tending toward a unification or transcendence of the older forms of variation within the tradition. The second, countervailing tendency has been an increasing fragmentation of structures of authority within the tradition, a proliferation of the meanings attributed to it and of the forms of practice taken to embody it, and a renewed acuity of internal sectarian conflict. This is a paradox that only an understanding of Islam as social practice embedded in the forms of secularity characteristic of modern societies—and emphatically not one of Islam as “medievally” religious and uniquely “secularization-resistant”—can apprehend.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 245.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/ahss.2019.63
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales More from this journal
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 411-439
- Publication date:
- 2019-08-13
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-05-22
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1953-8146
- ISSN:
-
0395-2649
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:853493
- UUID:
-
uuid:f00ac154-ba22-45a3-a424-b1a93fd85765
- Local pid:
-
pubs:853493
- Source identifiers:
-
853493
- Deposit date:
-
2018-05-22
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Éditions EHESS
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2019 Éditions de l'EHESS. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/ahss.2019.6
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record