Journal article icon

Journal article

Uterine compression sutures for the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage.

Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal outcomes after uterine compression suture use and to characterize the risk factors for failure, defined as cases that proceeded to hysterectomy. METHODS: A prospective population-based study of 1.2 million women delivering was conducted using the U.K. Obstetric Surveillance System to identify all women in the United Kingdom delivering between September 2007 and March 2009 and treated with uterine compression sutures. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven women were treated with a uterine compression suture to control postpartum hemorrhage. The overall rate of failure, leading to hysterectomy, was 25% (95% confidence interval, 19–31%); there were no significant differences in failure rates among B-Lynch sutures, modified B-Lynch sutures, and other suture techniques. Women were more likely to have a hysterectomy if they were aged 35 years or older (33% compared with 20% aged younger than 35 years), multiparous (33% compared with 14% in nulliparous), in unemployed and routine or manual occupational groups (28% compared with 17% in managerial or professional groups), had a vaginal delivery (47% compared with 22% in the cesarean delivery group), or a delay of between 2 and 6 hours from delivery to uterine suture compression (42% compared with 16% with delay less than 1 hour). CONCLUSION: A prolonged delay of 2–6 hours between delivery and uterine compression suture was independently associated with a fourfold increase in the odds of hysterectomy. These data emphasize the need for a careful evaluation of blood loss after delivery to avoid any prolonged delay in recognition of hemorrhage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III
Publication status:
Published

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1097/aog.0b013e318202c596

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author


Journal:
Obstetrics and gynecology More from this journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
1
Pages:
14-20
Publication date:
2011-01-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1873-233X
ISSN:
0029-7844


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:236799
UUID:
uuid:ef640334-4d31-49de-939f-14b3305d68f0
Local pid:
pubs:236799
Source identifiers:
236799
Deposit date:
2012-12-19
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP