Journal article

Diagnosing peri-procedural myocardial injury following percutaneous coronary intervention: replacing confusion with consensus.

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

van Gaal, W., & Banning, A. (2012). Diagnosing peri-procedural myocardial injury following percutaneous coronary intervention: replacing confusion with consensus. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 98(20), 1473–1475.

MLA Style

van Gaal, W, and A Banning. “Diagnosing Peri-Procedural Myocardial Injury Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Replacing Confusion with Consensus.” Heart (British Cardiac Society), vol. 98, no. 20, 2012, pp. 1473–75.

Chicago Style

Gaal, W van, and A Banning. 2012. “Diagnosing Peri-Procedural Myocardial Injury Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Replacing Confusion with Consensus.” Heart (British Cardiac Society) 98 (20): 1473–75.
Print

Access Document

Publisher copy:: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302131

Authors

+ van Gaal, W More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Banning, A More by this author

Role:: Author

Journal:: Heart (British Cardiac Society) More from this journal
Volume:: 98
Issue:: 20
Pages:: 1473-1475
Publication date:: 2012-10-01
DOI:: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302131
EISSN:: 1468-201X
ISSN:: 1355-6037

Language:: English
Keywords:: Consensus

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Humans

Myocardial Infarction
Pubs id:: pubs:339930
UUID:: uuid:ef515138-68cb-477b-a71b-6e2ec17e84de
Local pid:: pubs:339930
Source identifiers:: 339930
Deposit date:: 2012-12-19
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_ef51513868cb477ba71b6e2ec17e84de

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 2012

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP