Journal article
Neurocognitive function at the first-line failure and on the second-line antiretroviral therapy in Africa: Analyses from the EARNEST trial.
- Abstract:
- OBJECTIVE: To assess neurocognitive function at the first-line antiretroviral therapy failure and change on the second-line therapy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS: Patients failing the first-line therapy according to WHO criteria after >12 months on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based regimens were randomized to the second-line therapy (open-label) with lopinavir/ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily) plus either 2-3 clinician-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, raltegravir, or as monotherapy after 12-week induction with raltegravir. Neurocognitive function was tested at baseline, weeks 48 and 96 using color trails tests 1 and 2, and the Grooved Pegboard test. Test results were converted to an average of the 3 individual test z-scores. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients (90% of those >18 years enrolled at 13 evaluable sites) had valid baseline tests (58% women, median: 38 years, viral load: 65,000 copies per milliliter, CD4 count: 73 cells per cubic millimeter). Mean (SD) baseline z-score was -2.96 (1.74); lower baseline z-scores were independently associated with older age, lower body weight, higher viral load, lower hemoglobin, less education, fewer weekly working hours, previous central nervous system disease, and taking fluconazole (P < 0.05 in multivariable model). Z-score was increased by mean (SE) of +1.23 (0.04) after 96 weeks on the second-line therapy (P < 0.001; n = 915 evaluable), with no evidence of difference between the treatment arms (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in sub-Saharan Africa failing the first-line therapy had low neurocognitive function test scores, but performance improved on the second-line therapy. Regimens with more central nervous system-penetrating drugs did not enhance neurocognitive recovery indicating this need not be a primary consideration in choosing a second-line regimen.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 511.3KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 299.8KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000898
Authors
- Publisher:
- Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
- Journal:
- Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome More from this journal
- Volume:
- 71
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 506-513
- Publication date:
- 2016-04-15
- Acceptance date:
- 2015-10-14
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1944-7884
- ISSN:
-
1525-4135
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:667924
- UUID:
-
uuid:eeda60c1-55c3-4770-9e65-d14a000b9e8d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:667924
- Source identifiers:
-
667924
- Deposit date:
-
2017-01-03
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins at: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000898
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record