Journal article
A psychometric evaluation of the 16-item PHQ-ADS concomitant anxiety and depression scale in the UK biobank using item response theory
- Abstract:
-
Background:
The Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) provides a reliable and valid measure of concomitant depression and anxiety. However, research on its psychometric efficiency and optimal scale length using item-response theory (IRT) has not been reported. This study aimed to optimize the length of the PHQ-ADS scale without losing information by discarding items that were a poor fit to the IRT model.
Methods:
The UK Biobank is a large cohort study designed to investigate risk factors for a broad range of disease. PHQ-ADS data were available from n = 152,826 participants (age = 55.87 years; SD = 7.73; 56.4 % female), 30.4 % of the entire UK Biobank sample. Psychometric properties of the PHQ-ADS were investigated using a 2-parameter IRT and Mokken analysis. Item statistics included discrimination, difficulty and Loevinger H coefficients of monotonicity.
Results:
In the entire 16-item scale, item discrimination ranged from 1.40 to 4.22, with the item 'worrying' showing the highest level of discrimination and the item 'sleep disturbance' showing the lowest. Mokken analysis showed that the 16-item PHQ-ADS scale could be reduced to a 7-item scale without loss of test information. The reduced scale comprised mainly items measuring cognitive-affective symptoms of anxiety/depression, whereas items measuring somatic symptoms were discarded. The revised scale showed high discrimination and scalability.
Limitations:
Findings are limited by the use of cross-sectional data that only included the baseline online questionnaire, but not other waves.
Conclusions:
IRT is a useful technique for scale reductions which serve the clinical and epidemiological need to optimize screening questionnaires to reduce redundancy and maximize information. A reduced-item 7-item PHQ-ADS scale reduces the response burden on participants in epidemiological research settings, without loss of information.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 376.1KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 2.7MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.067
Authors
+ Medical Research Council
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/03x94j517
- Grant:
- MR/L023784/2
- MR/L023784/1
- MR/T0333771
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Journal of Affective Disorders More from this journal
- Volume:
- 347
- Pages:
- 335-344
- Place of publication:
- Netherlands
- Publication date:
- 2023-11-22
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-11-18
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-2517
- ISSN:
-
0165-0327
- Pmid:
-
38000468
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1575150
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1575150
- Deposit date:
-
2025-06-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Pflanz et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Rights statement:
- © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record