The challenge of a 2-year follow-up after intervention for weight loss in primary care.

Holzapfel, C; Cresswell, L; Ahern, A; Fuller, N; Eberhard, M; Stoll, J; Mander, A; Jebb, SA; Caterson, I; Hauner, H

Journal article

The challenge of a 2-year follow-up after intervention for weight loss in primary care.

Abstract:: BACKGROUND: Many weight loss programmes show short-term success, but long-term data in larger studies are scarce, especially in community settings. Attrition is common and complicates the interpretation of long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate 2-year outcomes and explore issues of attrition and missing data. SUBJECTS: A total of 772 overweight and obese adults recruited by primary care practices in Australia, Germany and the UK and randomised to a 12-month weight loss intervention delivered in a commercial programme (CP) or in standard care (SC). MEASUREMENT: Weight change from 0-24 and 12-24 months including measured weights only and measured and self-reported weights, using last observation carried forward (LOCF), baseline observation carried forward (BOCF), completers-only and missing-at-random (MAR) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 203 participants completed the 24-month visit. Using measured weights only, there was a trend for greater 24-month weight loss in CP than in SC, but the difference was only statistically significant in the LOCF and BOCF analyses: LOCF: -4.14 vs -1.99 kg, difference adjusted for centre -2.08 kg, P<0.001; BOCF: -1.33 vs -0.74 kg, adjusted difference -0.60 kg, P=0.032; completers: -4.76 vs -2.99 kg, adjusted difference -1.53 kg, P=0.113; missing at random: -3.00 vs -1.94 kg, adjusted difference -1.04 kg, P=0.150. Both groups gained weight from 12-24 months and weight regain was significantly (P<0.001) greater for CP than for SC in all analysis approaches. Inclusion of self-reported weights from a further 138 participants did not change the interpretation of the findings. CONCLUSION: Initial weight loss was poorly maintained during the no-intervention follow-up, but both groups did have lower weight over the 24 months. Attrition was high in both groups, and assumptions about missing data had considerable impact on the magnitude and statistical significance of treatment effects. It is vital that trials on weight loss interventions consider the plausibility of these differences in an analytical approach when interpreting research findings and comparing data between studies.

Publication status:: Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Holzapfel, C., Cresswell, L., Ahern, A., Fuller, N., Eberhard, M., Stoll, J., Mander, A., Jebb, S. A., Caterson, I., & Hauner, H. (2014). The challenge of a 2-year follow-up after intervention for weight loss in primary care. International Journal of Obesity (2005), 38(6), 806–811.

MLA Style

Holzapfel, C, et al. “The Challenge of a 2-Year Follow-up after Intervention for Weight Loss in Primary Care.” International Journal of Obesity (2005), vol. 38, no. 6, 2014, pp. 806–11.

Chicago Style

Holzapfel, C, L Cresswell, A Ahern, et al. 2014. “The Challenge of a 2-Year Follow-up after Intervention for Weight Loss in Primary Care.” International Journal of Obesity (2005) 38 (6): 806–11.
Print