Journal article icon

Journal article

Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic spinal cord herniation: A Case Report under Neuromonitoring and Meta-analysis of 211 reviewed Cases

Abstract:
BackgroundIdiopathic spinal cord herniation (ISCH) is a rare condition caused by a ventral or ventrolateral dural defect. Two surgical strategies are used: non-closure (Group I), consisting of reduction and adhesiolysis with or without enlargement of the defect, and closure (Group II), involving reduction followed by direct or indirect dural repair. This study compared these approaches.MethodsWe reported a case of ISCH treated under neuromonitoring. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including surgically treated cases confirmed by MRI or CT myelography, excluding traumatic, iatrogenic, and discogenic etiologies. Outcomes included neurological status at final follow-up, recurrence, and surgical complications.ResultsA 50-year-old patient with progressive Brown-Séquard syndrome underwent surgery; neuromonitoring deterioration during attempted closure prompted conversion to non-closure. At the final follow-up, a clinical improvement without recurrence or complications was observed. Through the review, we identified 211 patients, including our case (mean age 50.99 ± 13.25 years; 58.7% female). Median follow-up was 24.16 months. In Group I, 53 improved, 4 were unchanged, and 2 worsened; in Group II, 114 improved, 27 were unchanged, and 9 worsened. Non-closure was associated with higher odds of improvement in the unadjusted analysis (POR 2.74, 95% CI 1.09-6.90, p = 0.032), but this association attenuated after adjustment (adjusted POR 2.53, 95% CI 0.69-9.31, p = 0.16). Complication rates were 3.38% vs 8.00% (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.04-1.90); recurrence occurred once in each Group.ConclusionsBoth strategies are comparable. The non-closure could be a better choice, since it requires less manipulation. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a valuable decision-making tool in ISCH surgery.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.bas.2026.105958

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0000-1252-6649
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2614-610X


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Brain and Spine More from this journal
Volume:
6
Pages:
105958
Article number:
105958
Publication date:
2026-02-02
DOI:
EISSN:
2772-5294
ISSN:
2772-5294
Pmid:
41716878


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2371660
Local pid:
pubs:2371660
Source identifiers:
3809203
Deposit date:
2026-02-28
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP