Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Physiology-guided personalized mechanical ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury

Abstract:
Mechanical ventilation is essential for managing acute respiratory failure, yet it carries a significant risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Lung-protective ventilation, most notably through the use of low tidal volumes, has improved outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but these conventional strategies do not fully account for the profound heterogeneity of the injured lung or the variability in patient-specific physiology. Although tidal volumes of 4–8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) provide a general reference for limiting strain, truly protective ventilation requires individualization based on regional aeration, compliance, and recruitability. Variability in these parameters leads to uneven distributions of stress and strain, while dynamic changes in respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and cardiopulmonary interactions further complicate uniform ventilatory management. The mechanisms underlying VILI: barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma extend beyond the lung parenchyma and contribute to ventilator-associated diaphragm dysfunction and secondary organ injury. Bedside physiological tools, including esophageal manometry, electrical impedance tomography, and lung ultrasound, allow real-time evaluation of lung stress, regional ventilation, recruitability, and patient effort. When incorporated into clinical decision-making, these modalities facilitate individualized adjustments aimed at avoiding overdistension and collapse, limiting injurious pressures and volumes, and maintaining adequate gas exchange and hemodynamic stability. Advances in technology, such as closed-loop ventilation systems, adaptive control algorithms, and computational modeling, offer additional opportunities to refine personalized strategies and anticipate harmful mechanical patterns. Collectively, physiology-guided, personalized mechanical ventilation shifts practice from protocol-driven approaches to patient-centered care, with the overarching goal of mitigating VILI and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.3389/fmed.2026.1764151

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Frontiers Media
Journal:
Frontiers in Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
13
Pages:
1764151
Article number:
1764151
Publication date:
2026-02-12
Acceptance date:
2026-01-27
DOI:
EISSN:
2296-858X
ISSN:
2296-858X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2381867
Local pid:
pubs:2381867
Source identifiers:
3803077
Deposit date:
2026-02-26
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP