Journal article
Making people with aphasia speak for themselves in conversation: non-collaboration by significant others in the production of answers to test questions
- Abstract:
-
Background: Non-collaboration by significant others (SOs) in interactions with people with aphasia has been previously observed in the context of known-response activities. However, there is no evidence in these studies of an overtly negative stance or criticism by the SOs or interactional discord.
Aims: This study aims to explore a more extreme form of non-collaboration in test question activities. Specifically, we examine how SOs’ practice in these testing activities relates to (1) the typically prolonged nature of the person with aphasia’s (PWA) attempts; and (2) the negative stances by the SOs and the interactional discord that are regularly displayed in these conversations when this practice is employed. Second, we use these findings to provide an overview of the different practices employed by SOs in test question activities, comparing them in the form of a continuum of options (or interactional “styles”) available to SOs, and we highlight the dilemmas faced by SOs in knowing what to do for the best when interacting with their family members with aphasia.
Methods: We use Conversation Analysis (CA) to analyze domestic conversations between two PWA-SO couples, focusing on the practice employed by SO in test question sequences when the PWA struggles to produce an adequate answer.
Conclusion: The practices employed by SOs indicate that they treat their partner with aphasia as someone who should be autonomous and “speak for themselves” in that they should produce a certain type of utterance in the conversation (here, an answer to a test question) by themselves and without any substantive assistance from the SO. When this practice is employed by the SOs, the activity ceases being solely about eliciting the correct answer; it regularly also becomes a locus of interactional discord.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 2.4MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/02687038.2025.2516047
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor & Francis
- Journal:
- Aphasiology More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2025-06-12
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-05-30
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1464-5041
- ISSN:
-
0268-7038
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2132281
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2132281
- Deposit date:
-
2025-06-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Yang et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record