Journal article
Principals without distinction
- Abstract:
- Reflects on the distinctions which the law draws between participants in a crime. Examines the justifications for distinguishing: (1) between principals and accomplices, including how an "accessory" is defined; (2) between an accomplice to one crime and to further crimes; and (3) between different fault elements, especially intention, foresight of risk and conditional intention. Discusses the advantages of maintaining clearly-drawn distinctions.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
- Publisher:
- Sweet & Maxwell
- Journal:
- Criminal Law Review More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2018
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 296-320
- Publication date:
- 2018-04-30
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-01-04
- ISSN:
-
0011-135X
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:826660
- UUID:
-
uuid:eb5394ca-c169-4df2-b1ee-5ef7c4850d68
- Local pid:
-
pubs:826660
- Source identifiers:
-
826660
- Deposit date:
-
2018-02-25
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Sweet & Maxwell
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2019 Sweet & Maxwell. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The definitive published version is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record