Journal article icon

Journal article

Principals without distinction

Abstract:
Reflects on the distinctions which the law draws between participants in a crime. Examines the justifications for distinguishing: (1) between principals and accomplices, including how an "accessory" is defined; (2) between an accomplice to one crime and to further crimes; and (3) between different fault elements, especially intention, foresight of risk and conditional intention. Discusses the advantages of maintaining clearly-drawn distinctions.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed
Version:
Accepted Manuscript

Actions


Access Document


Files:

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Social Sciences Division
Department:
Law; Law Faculty
Oxford college:
CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Sweet & Maxwell Publisher's website
Journal:
Criminal Law Review Journal website
Volume:
2018
Issue:
4
Pages:
296-320
Publication date:
2018-04-30
Acceptance date:
2018-01-04
ISSN:
0011-135X
Pubs id:
pubs:826660
URN:
uri:eb5394ca-c169-4df2-b1ee-5ef7c4850d68
UUID:
uuid:eb5394ca-c169-4df2-b1ee-5ef7c4850d68
Local pid:
pubs:826660

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP