Journal article icon

Journal article

Spatial structure mitigates fitness costs in host-parasite coevolution

Abstract:
The extent of population mixing is known to influence the coevolutionary outcomes of many host and parasite traits, including the evolution of generalism (the ability to resist or infect a broad range of genotypes). While the segregation of populations into interconnected demes has been shown to influence the evolution of generalism, the role of local interactions between individuals is unclear. Here, we combine an individual-based model of microbial communities with a well-established framework of genetic specificity that matches empirical observations of bacterium-phage interactions. We find the evolution of generalism in well-mixed populations to be highly sensitive to the severity of associated fitness costs, but the constraining effect of costs on the evolution of generalism is lessened in spatially structured populations. The contrasting outcomes between the two environments can be explained by different scales of competition (i.e., global vs. local). These findings suggest that local interactions may have important effects on the evolution of generalism in host-parasite interactions, particularly in the presence of high fitness costs.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1086/674826

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Zoology
Role:
Author


Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
Journal:
American naturalist More from this journal
Volume:
183
Issue:
3
Pages:
E64-E74
Publication date:
2014-01-14
Acceptance date:
2013-08-21
DOI:
EISSN:
1537-5323
ISSN:
0003-0147


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:450943
UUID:
uuid:eb0f6e81-7ef6-450f-ac6e-2b885dff8255
Local pid:
pubs:450943
Source identifiers:
450943
Deposit date:
2016-05-02
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP