Journal article
'How many interviews do I need?' An examination of interview numbers and sampling moves in qualitative research
- Abstract:
- Qualitative researchers face an enduring question: how many interviews do I need? While a variety of guidelines exist, there is limited consensus over which specific factors should determine the number of interviews required. We examined the determination of interview sample sizes in 562 qualitative studies across six high-impact management and organizational journals over a decade. Our findings reveal considerable variance in interview numbers, yet often, limited information is provided on the criteria used to determine them. To promote clearer alignment between sample sizes and methodology, we examined studies with detailed descriptions of their interview sampling. We identified specific ‘sampling moves’ used to determine the number of interviews, categorized into three types—opening, focusing, and closing sampling moves—that researchers use to establish confidence in the sample and support theoretical insights. By implication, our study refutes the notion of a “magic” interview number. Instead, sampling moves are heuristic tools that qualitative researchers can thoughtfully adapt to their analytical aims when determining appropriate sample sizes.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 603.1KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 204.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1177/10944281261424516
Authors
- Publisher:
- SAGE Publications
- Journal:
- Organizational Research Methods More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2026-04-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2026-01-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1552-7425
- ISSN:
-
1094-4281
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2362365
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2362365
- Deposit date:
-
2026-01-20
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elmholdt et al
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2026.
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record