Journal article
This quarrel which is not one: women’s interventions in an Eighteenth-Century French quarrel about boys’ education
- Abstract:
- This article explores the women’s interventions in an overlooked eighteenth-century quarrel about how to reform literary teaching in the boys’ collèges. It begins by introducing this quarrel, which I call the Querelle des collèges, and which involved over 120 actors: just three of whom are known to be women. After presenting the quarrel texts written by Adelaïde d’Espinassy, Joséphine de Montbart, and Anne d’Aubourg de La Bove, comtesse de Miremont, the article explores why and how these women engaged in such a highly-publicised, male-dominated quarrel. They intervened, I show, so as to redirect public interest in reforming boys’ schools towards the reform of girls’ education. And they employed creative strategies to minimise the risk they ran, as women, by quarrelling. By embedding their texts in other, existing disputes concerning women, and by engaging creatively with agonistic discursive practices usually reserved for men, these women destabilized this masculine dispute. In so doing, they reclaimed some room in this quarrel (and others like it) for women.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 316.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1215/00358118-9377374
Authors
- Publisher:
- Duke University Press
- Journal:
- Romanic Review More from this journal
- Volume:
- 112
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 486–504
- Publication date:
- 2021-12-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-05-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2688-5220
- ISSN:
-
0035-8118
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1198401
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1198401
- Deposit date:
-
2021-10-04
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 by the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Duke University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00358118-9377374
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record