Journal article icon

Journal article

Prior and new knowledge in language comprehension: referent lifetime status versus biographical accomplishments

Abstract:
Knowledge about the real-world, fictional worlds, and well-known individuals is rapidly available during language processing, eliciting rapid processing costs when contradicted. Less is known about how effects of knowing famous personalities' lifetime status (dead or alive in a year) compare to effects of knowing their factual accomplishments (e.g., having starred in a movie) during language comprehension. Likewise, rapid processing costs ensue when short-term knowledge acquired through one-shot learning is contradicted. We ask whether such effects vary depending on whether knowledge of a famous referent is prior-held, recently learned, or absent. In two eye-tracking during reading experiments we investigated how world knowledge conveyed via photographs of well-known referents influences the processing of temporal (lifetime-year) and (referent-specific) factual knowledge (mis)matches. We distinguished whether people had the world knowledge, were trained on it and learned it new, or did not have it. In both experiments, congruence effects emerged in world-knowledge-present trials. In Experiment 1 (64 participants), lifetime-year and referent-fact congruence effects were elicited across measures, with nested congruence effects in total reading times in world-knowledge present, but not absent, trials. In Experiment 2 (32 participants), lifetime-year (but not referent-fact) congruence effects emerged with no significant differences between prior and newly-learned knowledge trials. These findings confirm that prior-held factual knowledge is rapidly available during processing. In addition, they provide novel evidence that both prior-held and newly-learned temporal (lifetime) knowledge influences comprehension, with implications for models of memory integration and the contribution of prior knowledge in language comprehension.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106579

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Linguistics Philology & Phonetics
Oxford college:
St Hugh's College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6446-5582



Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Acta Psychologica More from this journal
Volume:
265
Pages:
106579-
Article number:
106579
Place of publication:
Netherlands
Publication date:
2026-04-04
Acceptance date:
2026-03-02
DOI:
EISSN:
1873-6297
ISSN:
0001-6918
Pmid:
41930522


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2408755
Local pid:
pubs:2408755
Source identifiers:
W7148796617
Deposit date:
2026-04-29
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP