The consequences of the new European reclassification of non-invasive brain stimulation devices and the medical device regulations pose an existential threat to research and treatment: an invited opinion paper

Antal, A; Ganho-Ávila, A; Assecondi, S; Barbour, T; Bjekić, J; Blumberger, DM; Bolognini, N; Brunelin, J; Chanes, L; Dale, M; Dubbioso, R; D'Urso, G; Filipcic, I; Filipović, SR; Hirnstein, M; Konings, F; Langguth, B; Leocani, L; Sorkhabi, MM; Mulder, M; Nikander, M; Nowak, R; Oliviero, A; Onarheim, B; O'Shea, J; Pallanti, S; Rachid, F; Rajão-Saraiva, J; Rossi, S; Sack, AT; Sauvaget, A; van der Scheer, R; Schellhorn, K; Soria-Frisch, A; Szekely, D; Tankisi, H; Cj Taylor, P; Tendolkar, I; Uusitalo, S; Baeken, C

Neuroscience & Neuroimaging Research Collection

Journal article

The consequences of the new European reclassification of non-invasive brain stimulation devices and the medical device regulations pose an existential threat to research and treatment: an invited opinion paper

Abstract:: A significant amount of European basic and clinical neuroscience research includes the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), mainly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Two recent changes in the EU regulations, the introduction of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (2017/745) and the Annex XVI have caused significant problems and confusions in the brain stimulation field. The negative consequences of the MDR for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) have been largely overlooked and until today, have not been consequently addressed by National Competent Authorities, local ethical committees, politicians and by the scientific communities. In addition, a rushed bureaucratic decision led to seemingly wrong classification of NIBS products without an intended medical purpose into the same risk group III as invasive stimulators. Overregulation is detrimental for any research and for future developments, therefore researchers, clinicians, industry, patient representatives and an ethicist were invited to contribute to this document with the aim of starting a constructive dialogue and enacting positive changes in the regulatory environment.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Antal, A., Ganho-Ávila, A., Assecondi, S., Barbour, T., Bjekić, J., Blumberger, D. M., Bolognini, N., Brunelin, J., Chanes, L., Dale, M., Dubbioso, R., D'Urso, G., Filipcic, I., Filipović, S. R., Hirnstein, M., Konings, F., Langguth, B., Leocani, L., Sorkhabi, M. M., … Baeken, C. (2024). The consequences of the new European reclassification of non-invasive brain stimulation devices and the medical device regulations pose an existential threat to research and treatment: an invited opinion paper. Clinical Neurophysiology, 163, 280–291.

MLA Style

Antal, A, et al. “The Consequences of the New European Reclassification of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Devices and the Medical Device Regulations Pose an Existential Threat to Research and Treatment: an Invited Opinion Paper.” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 163, 2024, pp. 280–91.

Chicago Style

Antal, A, A Ganho-Ávila, S Assecondi, et al. 2024. “The Consequences of the New European Reclassification of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Devices and the Medical Device Regulations Pose an Existential Threat to Research and Treatment: an Invited Opinion Paper.” Clinical Neurophysiology 163: 280–91.
Print